<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Jonathan's Pancheria: del.icio.us bookmarks - 2006-07-13</title>
    <link>http://blog.dotbot.net/articles/2006/07/14/del-icio-us-bookmarks-2006-07-13</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>dotcom Thousandaire</description>
    <item>
      <title>del.icio.us bookmarks - 2006-07-13</title>
      <description>&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://tarmo.fi/blog/2005/09/09/dont-draw-diagrams-of-wrong-practices-or-why-people-still-believe-in-the-waterfall-model/"&gt;Psyc+Tech » Blog Archive » Don’t draw diagrams of wrong practices &amp;#8211; or: Why people still believe in the Waterfall model&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;so why do people still advocate the waterfall? If you look at the scientific articles on software engineering that discuss the waterfall, they all cite Royce’s article. In other words, they’re saying something like “The waterfall is a proven method&lt;/li&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;Posted: Thu Jul 13 04:07:27 &lt;span class="caps"&gt;GMT 2006&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Click &lt;a href="http://del.icio.us/metatecture/"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; for all of my del.icio.us bookmarks.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 07:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:3f516701-ac07-45d1-986d-66680784925b</guid>
      <author>Delicious auto poster</author>
      <link>http://blog.dotbot.net/articles/2006/07/14/del-icio-us-bookmarks-2006-07-13</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

